{"id":1013,"date":"2014-08-25T10:35:38","date_gmt":"2014-08-25T15:35:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bly.com\/blog\/?p=1013"},"modified":"2016-04-05T10:35:58","modified_gmt":"2016-04-05T15:35:58","slug":"the-awful-truth-about-online-customer-reviews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/general\/the-awful-truth-about-online-customer-reviews\/","title":{"rendered":"The awful truth about online customer reviews"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The notion of posting online customer reviews of products and<br \/>\nservices \u2014 such as is done on Angie\u2019s List and Amazon \u2014 has some<br \/>\ntroubling flaws.<\/p>\n<p>I will focus here on Amazon since I have never used Angie\u2019s<br \/>\nlist \u2026 and as an author, I have a lot of exposure to the reviews<br \/>\nposted on Amazon.<\/p>\n<p>The first problem is what book marketing guru John Kremer,<br \/>\nauthor of the classic \u201c1,001 Ways to Market Your Book,\u201d calls<br \/>\n\u201cagenda-driven reviews.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>One example is when I am looking at the page on Amazon for some<br \/>\nmarketing guru\u2019s new book and I see immediately two dozen<br \/>\nfive-star reviews and nothing lower.<\/p>\n<p>I can\u2019t help notice that virtually all the reviewers are the<br \/>\nauthor\u2019s friends, associates, joint venture partners, and<br \/>\naffiliates.<\/p>\n<p>The reviewers\u2019 agenda is clear: to help the author hype his<br \/>\nbook. The motive? To have the author reciprocate and do the same<br \/>\nfor them.<\/p>\n<p>The opposite situation is when the reviewer clearly has a grudge<br \/>\neither against the author or his philosophy or ideas \u2014 and posts<br \/>\na one-star review for what any sensible person would agree is a<br \/>\nsolid, good book on the topic.<\/p>\n<p>The second problem with the Amazon review system is that,<br \/>\nincredibly, I have seen a number of reviews where the reviewer<br \/>\nsays she has not read the book yet but will get to it soon \u2014 and<br \/>\namazingly, Amazon has let the review stand.<\/p>\n<p>Can you imagine a book reviewer for the New York Times Book<br \/>\nReview writing in his review that he has not yet read the book<br \/>\nin question?<\/p>\n<p>The third problem, which brings up a broader issue I will<br \/>\naddress in a minute, is reviews written by reviewers who are<br \/>\nunqualified to evaluate the book in question. A related problem<br \/>\nis when the reviewer\u2019s comments are just plain stupid or<br \/>\ntrivial.<\/p>\n<p>I subscribe to the New York Review of books, and if they are<br \/>\nrunning a review of a new biography of Abraham Lincoln, the<br \/>\nreviewer they hire will most certainly be a historian or<br \/>\npresidential biographer or Lincoln scholar.<\/p>\n<p>But on Amazon, you can post a review of a book on woodworking<br \/>\neven if you have never in your life driven a nail into a 2X4.<\/p>\n<p>And in your Amazon review, you can blatantly say things that are<br \/>\nwrong, because Amazon doesn\u2019t seem to check it or prevent it<br \/>\nfrom being published.<\/p>\n<p>As for stupid or trivial comments: one of my books got a<br \/>\none-star review because the reader did not like the paper it was<br \/>\nprinted on.<\/p>\n<p>The reason I like traditional print media like newspapers,<br \/>\nmagazines, and published books is that the authors and their<br \/>\nwritings are vetted by editors and publishers.<\/p>\n<p>A columnist for PC Magazine once wisely observed: \u201cThe worst<br \/>\nthing about the Internet is that anyone and everyone can publish<br \/>\nanything to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Internet in general and social media in particular<br \/>\nencourages the belief that everyone is entitled to their<br \/>\nopinion. And it has given those people a vehicle for easily<br \/>\npublishing those views, no matter how wrong or inane.<\/p>\n<p>Writer Harlan Ellison correctly states: \u201cEveryone is not<br \/>\nentitled to their opinion. They are entitled to their informed<br \/>\nopinion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cInformed opinion\u201d means you have some experience, knowledge,<br \/>\nqualifications, or credentials in the subject you are writing<br \/>\nabout.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, is it OK for me to write a negative review of a<br \/>\nbook on home schooling if I have never tried the author\u2019s<br \/>\nmethods or worse, never home-schooled my kids \u2014 or even worse,<br \/>\ndon\u2019t even have kids? I think not. But I can do it on Amazon all<br \/>\nday long. And so can you and everyone else reading this e-mail.<\/p>\n<p>If the NY Times Book Review hired me to review a book on home<br \/>\nschooling, you can bet I would have to be a parent and probably<br \/>\na pediatrician or parenting writer to get the gig.<\/p>\n<p>Another example: I once was hired to write a direct mail package<br \/>\nbeing mailed to engineers selling them a membership in a<br \/>\nprofessional society.<\/p>\n<p>The client gave it to a dozen people to review. Many of them<br \/>\nsuggested changes that made no sense to me, mainly based on the<br \/>\nfact that they did not understand some of the technical topics<br \/>\ndiscussed in the letter \u2014 for instance, why chemical engineers<br \/>\nwant to increase process yields.<\/p>\n<p>It turned out that none of the reviewers was an engineer. As<br \/>\nsuch, I considered their opinion as to what would or would not<br \/>\nengage engineers to be extremely uninformed.<\/p>\n<p>The only one involved in the creation of the DM package who was<br \/>\nin fact an engineer was the copywriter \u2014 me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The notion of posting online customer reviews of products and services \u2014 such as is done on Angie\u2019s List and Amazon \u2014 has some troubling flaws. I will focus here on Amazon since I have never used Angie\u2019s list \u2026 and as an author, I have a lot of exposure to the reviews posted on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1848,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1848"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1013"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1013\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1014,"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1013\/revisions\/1014"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bly.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}